Compare · SEO suites and rank trackers

Lumar vs Conductor

Lumar and Conductor are both enterprise platforms, and both are quote-only. Lumar (formerly Deepcrawl) is rooted in technical crawling: analysis, monitoring, release QA and accessibility. Conductor is broader: rank tracking, content tools, AI search credits, and 24/7 website monitoring inherited from ContentKing, which it acquired in 2022.

At the time of writing (September 2026), Conductor's pricing page describes a usage-based model with Essentials, Growth and Enterprise tiers and lists limits (from 500 tracked keywords and monitoring of up to 100K pages on Essentials). Lumar's pricing page asks you to request a quote.

Lumar vs Conductor side by side

From each product’s own site or our research, at the time of writing (September 2026). Prices and terms change, so check before you decide.

Comparison of Lumar and Conductor
Feature	Lumar	Conductor
Roots	Technical crawling (Deepcrawl)	Enterprise SEO platform + ContentKing monitoring
Price	Quote only	Quote only; usage-based
Monitoring	Monitor app	24/7 real-time monitoring, up to 60 months of change history
Release QA	Protect app for CI/CD	Not a headline feature
Rank tracking	Not its focus	500 / 5,000 / 60,000+ keywords by tier
Content tools	No	Writing Assistant (60 drafts a year on Essentials)
Accessibility	WCAG 2.2 A to AAA	Not a headline feature
Trial	Demo	3-week free trial (monitoring)

Which should you pick?

Pick Lumar if…

Your main need is deep technical crawling and QA before releases.
Accessibility reporting matters to your organisation.
Engineering owns SEO health.

Lumar’s site · LaunchRanked vs Lumar

Pick Conductor if…

You want one platform for tracking, content and monitoring.
You relied on ContentKing and want continuous change alerts.
Marketing owns SEO and needs content workflows too.

Conductor’s site · LaunchRanked vs Conductor

Where LaunchRanked fits

Disclosure: LaunchRanked is our product. Where we list it, we say so, and we place it under the use case it fits rather than at the top by default. Everything else here is from the vendors’ own sites or our research, and we say where they’re better.

We don't sell a crawler. Both tools find technical issues; neither fixes them. Both are built for large organisations. For a startup, Search Console plus a desktop crawler usually covers the same ground at a fraction of the cost.

If the audit keeps finding problems nobody has time to fix, Done-for-you (from $999/mo) includes technical SEO by hand. Autopilot ($49/mo, early access) handles content and Search Console title rewrites, not site code.

Frequently asked questions

What happened to ContentKing?

Conductor announced it was acquiring ContentKing in February 2022. contentkingapp.com now redirects to Conductor's monitoring product.

Do Lumar or Conductor publish prices?

Neither publishes prices at the time of writing (September 2026). Conductor lists tier limits; Lumar asks for a quote.

Which tracks AI search?

Conductor lists AI Search Credits on every tier. Lumar lists GEO/AEO metrics among its analysis areas.

Sources we checked

Checked on their own sites on 23 September 2026. Prices and terms change, so check before you buy. Domain ratings are approximate third-party estimates.