Playbook · B2B software
SEO & AI search playbook for cybersecurity startups
Security buyers search in two modes. One is urgent: a new vulnerability, an alert they don't understand, an audit next month. The other is slow: a compliance programme, a vendor review, a shortlist for a new category.
Both reward precision. A page that is vague about what a control covers, or that hypes a threat, loses trust with exactly the readers you want. And because you sell security, your own site's hygiene is part of the pitch.
Updated By the LaunchRanked team7 sources checked
Searches to plan around
Query patterns and the intent behind them. We don’t quote search volumes: check your own Search Console for the ones you already appear for.
“[framework] requirements”, “[framework] checklist”
Compliance planningSOC 2, ISO 27001 and similar. Map requirements to what your product does and doesn't cover.
“[CVE ID]”, “[product] vulnerability [month year]”
Urgent researchShort-lived and competitive. Only cover what you can add to, such as detection steps for your product's users.
“what is [attack technique]”
LearningEvergreen explainers. Link to the authoritative source for the technique and add your own detection guidance.
“[category] vendors”, “[incumbent] alternatives”
ShortlistingSecurity buyers read analyst reports and peer reviews. Your own comparison pages must be factual and dated.
Page families that work
Framework guides
/compliance/soc-2
Requirements, evidence examples, and which parts your product automates. Different frameworks have different structures, which keeps pages distinct.
Detection and response guides
/guides/detect-credential-stuffing
Practical steps, logs to check, queries to run. Useful to defenders even if they never buy.
Trust center
/trust
Certifications, subprocessors, data locations, disclosure policy. Procurement searches for this by brand.
Risky page types
Auto-generated pages for every CVE
Thousands of pages that repeat a public database entry add nothing, fit Google's scaled content abuse description, and go stale fast.
Fear-led threat content
Inflated claims about threats hurt trust with technical readers and give assistants nothing solid to cite.
Technical pitfalls
No security.txt
RFC 9116 defines /.well-known/security.txt with required Contact and Expires fields. A security company without one looks careless to researchers.
Trust center behind a login or NDA wall
Keep a public summary page (certifications, locations, policies) even if reports need an NDA. Otherwise brand queries about compliance have no answer on your site.
Heavy bot protection blocking crawlers
Aggressive WAF or bot rules can block Googlebot or AI search crawlers. Check your rules against the documented user agents from OpenAI, Perplexity and Anthropic, and make sure Googlebot isn't challenged.
How AI assistants answer questions in this category
Security questions to assistants range from “what is SOC 2 Type II?” to “how do I detect X in my logs?”. For definitions, assistants lean on what they already know. For specifics (a framework's control list, a detection query, whether a vendor has a certification), they search and cite pages that state the fact directly.
What tends to earn a citation
- Framework pages that list requirements precisely and link to the standard's own publisher.
- Detection guides with the actual log fields and queries, which are hard to paraphrase from memory.
- A public trust page that states certifications and dates plainly, so brand questions get a first-party answer.
Check whether the AI crawlers you want can reach your site with our AI crawler checker.
Where links come from
Research and disclosures
Original research published responsibly (with vendor coordination) is the main link source in security.
Conference talks and slides
Talks at security conferences get linked from event pages and write-ups. Publish slides and notes on your own site.
Open-source tooling
A small open-source scanner or rule set earns links from people who use it. List it in open-source directories.
Directory lists that fit cybersecurity startups
- SaaS directories
- Developer tool directories
- Open-source directories
- Software review sites
- Where to submit: Developer tools
- Where to submit: B2B software review sites
- All directories
Each directory is checked on its own site: price, link type and review process. We never sell links.
A 90-day plan
Days 1–30
Hygiene first
- Publish security.txt and a public trust summary.
- Check WAF rules against verified crawler IP lists.
- Set up Search Console and review brand queries about compliance.
Days 31–60
Framework and detection content
- Write guides for the two or three frameworks your buyers ask about most.
- Publish five detection guides with real queries.
- Link each guide to the product capability that helps.
Days 61–90
Authority
- Publish one piece of original research or a free tool.
- Turn a talk or webinar into a written page.
- Rewrite titles on pages at positions 5–20.
What to watch in Search Console
The Performance report gives clicks, impressions, CTR and average position by query, page, country, device and date. Traffic from Google's AI features is counted there too, under the Web search type (Google).
- Brand + compliance queries
- Queries like “[brand] SOC 2” show procurement activity. Make sure they land on the trust page.
- Crawl stats after WAF changes
- Search Console's Crawl stats report shows if Googlebot is getting blocked responses.
- Impressions on detection guides
- These are your non-brand discovery pages. Growth here means new people are finding you.
Frequently asked questions
Should we write about every new vulnerability?
Only when you can add something, such as detection steps for your users. Otherwise link to the authoritative advisory.
Can our trust center be public?
A summary can and should be. Detailed reports can sit behind an NDA request.
Do AI crawlers need special access?
They need to be allowed by robots.txt and not blocked by bot protection. Check each vendor's documented user agents and IP lists.
Is fear-based content effective?
It gets attention and loses trust. Security buyers are sceptical, and precise, calm content converts better with them.
Sources
Checked on September 23, 2026. Search patterns and page advice are our own judgement from running this playbook; we don’t quote search volumes or third-party statistics.
- Google Search Central: Spam policies for Google web search
- RFC 9116: A File Format to Aid in Security Vulnerability Disclosure
- OpenAI: Overview of OpenAI crawlers
- Perplexity: Perplexity crawlers
- Anthropic: Does Anthropic crawl data from the web?
- Google Search Central: AI features and your website
- Search Console Help: Performance report